Thursday, September 19, 2019 admin Comments(0)

chess publishing - chebanenko system - Free download as PDF File .pdf), Text D15 Chebanenko System/5 5 c5. 5 e4. D15 Chebanenko System/6 5. g5 3. Complete Slav 1 - Free download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online for free. Part 7 3.'3 'f6 4.e3 Variations, that are not entering the Meran Part 8 3.'f3 Variations, without early .. Chebanenko Slav PDF. Uploaded Winning With the Modern London System - Nikola Sedlak - - OCR OPT. Uploaded. Includes pgn, cbv and pdf download. April Chebanenko Slav 5.c5 Bf5 March Chebanenko System 5.c5 Bf5 July Geller Gambit echecs16.info2 March.

Language:English, Spanish, German
Genre:Personal Growth
Published (Last):20.01.2016
ePub File Size:17.45 MB
PDF File Size:12.14 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Register to download]
Uploaded by: CRYSTA

CHEBANENKO SYSTEM 3 PDF - Accompany FIDE Senior Trainer and IM Andrew Martin on this 60 mins video. You can learn a new opening system in 60 mins. 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 a6 The Chebanenko System. White has a wide range of options against this system 5. e3. (5. c5). (5. a4). Chebanenko also developed the system with echecs16.info5 in the Sicilian, which is yet the topic of another Bologan DVD, The Sicilian Rossolimo for.

Qc2 e6 6. Nf3 Nf6 4. Qc2 dxc4 5. Qxc4 Bf5 6. Nc3 3.

It creates a potential for bs which would fix Black's pawn s on b6 and a7, juicy targets for White's bishop later in the game. The bS advance would also create a possibility for l:i. Question: Thi s looks pretty risky, almost desperate. Are such radical measures necessary for Black's survival? Answer: Let's see if passive defence works: Conclusion : Black's position is on the brink of collapse and Kramnik's I'm afraid Anand botched the exercise! It occurs when I lead a m atch or a tournament and become prone to over-caution.

Just recently at the G ambito rapid tournament I play in every week, I beat a 2 , then a 49 Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve 2 2 5 1, followed by a win against a 2 1 I led the tournament by a full point going into the fourth and final round.

I got paired with a player, with the White pieces, and only drew the game with great difficulty! In Anand's case, it was easy to blow the win because in the back of his mind he could play it safe due to his lead in the m atch. Watch how in the next few moves Anand falls prey to this chess disease and avoids the strongest line. Answer: 30 d2! After Jic8 3 1 c3 a6 3 2 bS axb s 33 axbs ttJcs 34 xc4, White has excellent chances of converting his advantage. Reducing pawns with 30 as?!

Excellent defence. Black needs access t o c s for h i s knight o r rook in the future. Kramnik forces a pawn-down, drawn king and pawn ending.

chess publishing - chebanenko system | Traditional Board Games | Board Games

A quick examination shows that White's king h as no entry into Black's position and there is no win. Game s A. As mentioned previously, Black can al so reach this position by castling on m ove 8. Question: Why not pin with This is the type of position I normally go for as Black, rather than the normal The benefit of You can look at We tempt White into overextending; or 2. We just gave White two tempi for his attack! But m aybe it's like one of those inkblot tests psychiatrists show their patients.

People see what they want to see in any given m ove. Answer: 12 lbe4 i s playable but probably not better than the move chosen in the game. A logical path is Hector, Copenhag en An assessment: 1. White has an advanced pawn on es, but unlike similar Slav situations, h e doesn't really h ave an attack because Black i s so aggressively posted on the king side.


Black has a powerful knight outpost on ds. Black benefits from an open f-file and possible attacking chances there, or pressure later on against f2 or f4. White's advanced e - and a-pawns m ay turn into endgame targets. Conclusion : I am going to contradict Rybka who claims White has the edge and say Black has the better chances.

White has few chances for a king side attack due to the limited remaining m aterial. Black still has some hope for a win due to White's queenside weakness and hole on b4. Question: White controls m ore space and is g oing to pick up the bishop pair.

Pdf chebanenko system 3

Shoul d Black be worried? Sure, we give White the bishop pair but we also reduce the number of attackers and maybe strengthen our pawn structure around our king. Also, White has plenty to worry about: 1. Holes on ds and b4, controlled by Black; and 2.

A backward d4-pawn which could turn into a target later in the game. White gets cute and sets a trap for Black. Instead, he should play the more reliable White has good play in the form of targets on the kingside. Black has seen deeper and deliberately "falls into" White's trap.

Black wins a pawn and destroys White's pawn structure to boot. What am I missin g? Answer: This trick, which creates a short circuit between the queen on as and the bishop on d2, regains the m aterial. Question: Why did Black allow the knight fork?

H e looks pretty good in the line Answer: This is a n interesting psychological mom ent in the game.

Grischuk is playing for the win against his lower-rated G M opponent and is willing to take a calculated risk to do so. Black will win e S and probably get two pawn s for the exchange, a fair deal. The b-pawn surges forward and if White doesn 't find a way to win it in the next few moves it could spell big trouble for him.

Conclusion : The position looks pretty messy to us humans. H owever, computers see through the fog and Rybka finds a path to a clear advantage for White. The complexity of the position leads White astray and Grischuk's gamble pays off.

It's amazing how often a brave, semi-sound move works in chess. Securing the b-pawn. On c3 the queen sits at the top of the food chain with no natural predatory threats. White can 't find a way to win the pesky pawn and soon finds him self in a state of paralysis. The simple threat is Missing an opportunity. Answer: The ending is trivial after Question: Why didn't White return the exch ange in order to eliminate the b-pawn? Answer: Unfortunately for White, it is too late to bail out with 3 6 l:txc1 bxe1W 3 7 Wxc1, since after Threatening to undermine the knight with The queen creeps closer t o White's king and Black clears f4 for his knight.

Now 39 ttJxb5 fails to Black has too m any threats and Rybka claims a forced mate in 1 2!

Pdf 3 chebanenko system

Summary 11 e5 i s a reasonable alternative to Normally Bl ack plays White refuses t o commit t o either lZJxdS, which w e examined in Games , o r lbe4 lines, and keeps the position in stasis.

Let's take a closer look at 13 lLle4, and follow the game J. Black follows the principle: Capture away from the centre i f you feel that your king's safety is under threat.

Capturing away from the centre slightly weaken s Black's structure, but this is easily compen sated by the rook's activity on the f-file and heightened king safety.

The game continued 16 as a6 17 lZJe4 h 6 18 lbe1 l:. A brilliant positional exch ange sac to take over the light squares and get the king side pawn s rolling. Ehlvest wisely declined it, after which his space and Black's light-square control bal anced each other out. Returning to In David-Grischuk, White's bishop was on c4 and Black's on g6. Such subtle shifts should be noted because in the two games we execute radically different plan s!

Khalifm an, Moscow Question: It seems very difficult to determine when to play the Are there any guidelines Black can foll ow as to when Answer: Deciding if and when Black should play Here are a few guidelines you can follow to determine whether you should play the move or not: 1.

Black had better not lag in development at the mom ent of If there is a traffic jam of White pieces on the d-file, as in this g ame, you m ay be in a better position to play It is generally better to play The reason is after lZJxds you will normally be forced to accept an isolani on dS which could become a target for White.

If you have White's f3-knight pinned, then Conclusion : The line between when to play and when to avoid Intuitive understanding and proper timing of Now we begin to see some of the problems with White's 13th move: 59 Th e S l a v: M o ve by M o ve 1. White's f3-knight can't recapture due to the pin and his pieces are thrown a bit out of sync. Recapturing with the queen damages White's pawn cover around his king. The weakness of Black's future isolani on ds will be outweighed by the structural damage White sustains around his king.

Conclusion : This i s an example of a well-timed White has a good bishop, controls more space with his advanced e-pawn and m ay be able to attack along the open g-file. Black has an extra, doubled d-pawn but he won 't be able to keep it. Black's knight is a very strong piece. I t can b e m anoeuvred t o c s , e6 o r g 6 depending on circumstances.

White's king m ay become exposed l ater. Those broken white pawns could get hit with a well tim ed.. Conclusion : Maybe the chances are dynamically balanced but I still prefer Black, whose attacking chances and superior pawns look to me to outweigh White's plusses. Question: It looks l ike White i s trying to play positionally.

White just goes for a direct attack with everything he has. The following is a logical scenario: Ue7 1:te7. Drifting into passivity, which is a death sentence in m ajor piece endings.

It was time for White to take bold action and sac a pawn for activity: 2 3 l:tc7 :e7 The resulting position looks quite difficult to win for Black, despite his extra pawn. White is burdened with a doomed f4-pawn. Black simply gangs up on it with all his m ajor pieces. When the f-pawn falls, White's king faces serious trouble. White's control over the c-file doesn't mean much.

White has a tiny bit of pressure on Black's queenside pawns. Easy as pie! There are no full illustrative games on the DVD. He verbally notes when a line is from an actual game, but the games themselves are not included on the database. So why not include them, when it can be done with so little effort. Another thing lacking is some guidance from the publisher on how to best make use of the material.

It may seem obvious to them, but the are many users who would like things spelled out in greater detail.

A Head Start: Bologan on the improved Chebanenko

Here is how I would approach the material using it within ChessBase 12 or any of the Fritz family of programs; the ChessBase Reader that comes bundled with the DVD does not have such extensive functionality : Copy the games to a new database on your computer. I only copy the games, not the multimedia components. Watch the video clips from the DVD that you feel are most relevant to your repertoire. Once you have seen several segments and are itching to try the opening, play some practice games preferably against human opponents.

Copy your games into the notes of your newly created database. Compare you games with the recommendations by Bologan and review any of the relevant video clips.

Use a chess engine to evaluate the positions where your opponent deviates, as they ultimately will, and copy the analysis into the game notes. As you progress, look for similar games and copy those relevant to you into your database. For example, it was interesting to see the recently played game Kramnik-McShane from round five of the London Chess Classic Kramnik played the 5.

We can thus compare this to Bologan who recommends Bologan recommends his book as a companion to the DVD and to study the games of Malakhov, Rublevsky, and Carlsen, and, surprisingly, to use Houdini to find new moves and ideas for Black. With regard to checking with an engine, it is indeed necessary, especially for club players who may not follow all the nuances intuitively.

For instance, in the following position it is Black to move: Bologan follows the line Nc4 Qc7, without explaining that upon Qxb2 the queen gets trapped after Nc4 Qb5 Bologan also gives improvements compared to the book. In the line 1. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 a6 5. Ne5 Nbd7 6.