If Insight on the Scriptures is available in your language, then before you start reading a particular Bible book, review the brief outline of its highlights as provided. INSIGHT ON THE SCRIPTURES Volumes 1 & 2 [Watchtower Bible & Tract Society] on echecs16.info Author interviews, book reviews, editors' picks, and more. . Jw for 12 years pioneer then got terminal illness dying and need help the most. Watchtower Books. Here you will find links to published books by Jehovah's Witnesses. .. Insight On The Scriptures (it-E) . My Book of Bible Stories (my-E).
|Language:||English, Spanish, Hindi|
|Genre:||Health & Fitness|
|ePub File Size:||29.86 MB|
|PDF File Size:||10.62 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
Donations · JW Broadcasting · Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY™ · Log In · JW Library · JW Library Sign Language · Watchtower Library · JW Language. INSIGHT ON THE SCRIPTURES (Books). (See also Watch Tower Publications) differences between Insight and Aid: w89 3/15 features: w89 3/15 Books and Brochures for Bible Study. Study the Bible by topic with the help of these downloadable books and brochures. .. Insight on the Scriptures.
Maybe you can't remember what those letters stand for? I know I have had that problem. Well, if that's the case, here is a list of publications and the picture of the covers for your easy reference. Now you have just one less pressure in preparing your talk! Symbol Copyright Title - Some older publications before may not be currently listed as they have been updated with more current information.
The full quote is: "The Greek word for cross, stauros , properly signified a stake, an upright pole, or piece of paling, on which anything might be hung, or which might be used in impaling fencing in a piece of ground. But a modification was introduced as the dominion and usages of Rome extended themselves through Greek-speaking countries. Even amongst the Romans, the crux from which the word cross is derived appears to have been originally an upright pole, and always remained the more prominent part.
But from the time that it began to be used as an instrument of punishment, a traverse piece of wood was commonly added: not however always then.
It was on a cross of this form, according to the general voice of tradition, that our Lord suffered. The Appendix to the and editions of The New World Translation and the Kingdom Interlinear reproduces a woodcut illustration by Lipsius of a stake, stating, "This is the manner in which Jesus was impaled", giving the distinct impression that Lipsius supports Jesus death on a stake.
A Watchtower article attempts to give the same impression that Lipsius supported a stake.
His book included a total of 16 woodcuts, 9 depicting various forms of crucifixion. Under one of the crucifixion woodcuts is inscribed in Latin with, "In the Lord's cross there were four pieces of wood, the upright beam, the crossbar, a tree trunk placed below, and the title placed above. The research provided by Parsons regarding crux is flawed. For instance, he quotes Livy as using crux to mean stake Livy, xxviii. Livy used the word palus not crux in this passage - "Bound to a stake deligati ad palum they were scouraged and beheaded" Parsons also quotes Lucian saying Jesus was "fastened to a skolops;" De Morte Peregrini and claims Lucian used skolops to mean a single piece of wood.
Trinity Brochure The worst example of dishonesty amongst Watchtower literature regards the Trinity. When attacking the Trinity doctrine, the Watchtower resorts to a multitude of deceptive tactics, including the straw man technique of misdefining the Trinity, misquoting sources, and presenting specifically false information. The doctrine of the Trinity is that there are "three persons in one God".
At times, the Watchtower uses the straw man technique of misdefining the Trinity doctrine as "three Gods in one", such as in the following quote, so as to attack this incorrect definition.
Their worship is not distributed to three gods in one, the so-called godhead of some mysterious Trinity, but they are united as the one people who worship the one God, Jehovah.
Watchtower Mar 1 p. Nor do they discuss Modalism, which is an alternate doctrine about the nature of God that is believed by many Pentecostals.
Watchtower discussion melds Trinitarian and Modal concepts into one, and then attacks the inaccurate hybrid straw man that they themselves have created. The Watchtower also presents the history of the Trinity incorrectly, attempting to lead its followers to believe the Trinity did not develop until centuries after Jesus, and under pressure from Constantine. Should You Believe in the Trinity? Page 5 claims "this is no proof in itself that Tertullian taught the Trinity.
And these three are one thing; not one person. The Spirit of God is God. Partyka for an in-depth article with full source quotes of the partial quotes used in the Watchtower brochure Should you Believe the Trinity. In each case it is readily apparent that the Watchtower Society has distorted what the early Church Fathers were attempting to say.
Quotations are only partially referenced, making it difficult and time consuming to locate the original quote for verification purposes. The following partial Watchtower quotes are compared with the original quote to highlight how significantly the Watchtower is prepared to misrepresent sources to convince followers of their viewpoint.
It was not so in the apostolic and sub-apostolic ages, as reflected in the N[ew] T[estament] and other early Christian writings. Nowhere do we find any trinitarian doctrine of three distinct subjects of divine life and activity in the same Godhead. But they do give us an elemental trinitarianism, the data from which such a formal doctrine of the Triune God may be formulated. The Catholic Encyclopedia newadvent. The word?????
Shortly afterwards it appears in its Latin form of trinitas in Tertullian. The term may, of course, have been in use before his time. Then it cautions: "But hasty conclusions cannot be drawn from usage, for he does not apply the words to Trinitarian theology.
In many places of the OT however, expressions are used in which some of the Fathers of the Church saw references or foreshadowings of the Trinity. Washburn Hopkins affirmed: "To Jesus and Paul the doctrine of the trinity was apparently unknown;. By Evolution or by Creation? Evolutionary theory is mis-represented, Creationists are put forward as Scientists, and Scientists are quoted out of context.
At times, a scientific article will state a problem, which the article then addresses with a proposed solution. The Creation book will quote the problem as if is it an unsolved confession from a scientist, such as the Gould and Eldredge quote that follows from Discover, neglecting to advise that the article addresses the problem.
Many have been sourced by Jan Haugland , Feb Among paleontologists, scientists who study the fossil record, there is growing dissent from the prevailing view of Darwinism. Now that hallowed theory is not only under attack by fundamentalist Christians, but is also being questioned by reputable scientists.
Most of the debate will center on one key question: Does the three-billion-year-old process of evolution creep at a steady pace, or is it marked by long periods of inactivity punctuated by short bursts of rapid change? Darwin's widely accepted view -- that evolution proceeds steadily, at a crawl -- favors the tortoise. Sometimes it seems as though there are as many variations on each [evolutionary] theme as there are individual biologists.
Sometimes it seems as though there are as many variations on each theme as there are individual biologists. But that's as it should be; this is how science is supposed to operate. When they [Creationists] misrepresent the exuberant, creative doubt and controversy permeating evolutionary biology these days, they are actively promoting scientific illiteracy. This quote from David Raup is taken out of context, as the paper was not about the fossil record's evidence of common decent, but whether the mechanism of natural selection at the level of species is shown in the fossil record.
On page 22, Raup had prefaced his comment with, "We must distinguish between the fact of evolution -- defined as change in organisms over time -- and the explanation of this change. Darwin's contribution, through his theory of natural selection, was to suggest how the evolutionary change took place. The evidence we find in the geologic record is not nearly as compatible with darwinian natural selection as we would like it to be. For example, he wrote: "To suppose that the eye When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but the old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in science.
Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory.
It is designed to appeal to the imagination. But it is not science fiction: it is science. The purpose and content of the article goes on to address how polymerisation may have occurred.
Page "Fossil hunter Donald Johanson acknowledged: "No one can be sure just what any extinct hominid looked like. Johanson and Maitland A. Sizes here are to scale, with afarensis about two feet shorter than the average human being. Richard C. Lewontin, "Adaptation", Scientific American, vol. Life forms are more than simply multiple and diverse, however. Organisms fit remarkably well into the external world in which they live.
They have morphologies, physiologies and behaviors that appear to have been carefully and artfully designed to enable each organism to appropriate the world around it for its own life. It was the marvelous fit of organisms to the environment, much more than the great diversity of forms, that was the chief evidence of a Supreme Designer.
Darwin realized that if a naturalistic theory of evolution was to be successful, it would have to explain the apparent perfection of organisms and not simply their variation. He is also quoted in the Watchtower , and Awake Hitching is a favourite for quotes by Creationists. The Creation book quotes his book Neck of the Giraffe 13 times.
However, he has no scientific credentials, which he lies about in his book, as discussed at Hitching 12 Fe He is a paranormalist, and his book Earth Magic describes his belief in pyramid energy, astrology, ESP, dowsing and psychic research. The criticism of evolutionary theory in Neck of the Giraffe is used to advance his own theory regarding paranormal forces directing evolution. He is in no way a credible source, yet the Watchtower uses him as one of their primary sources of information in the Creation book.
Pages "The science of mathematical probability offers striking proof that the Genesis creation account must have come from a source with knowledge of the events. The account lists 10 major stages in this order: [ What are the chances that the writer of Genesis just guessed this order? The same as if you picked at random the numbers 1 to 10 from a box, and drew them in consecutive order.
The chances of doing this on your first try are 1 in 3,,! So, to say the writer just happened to list the foregoing events in the right order without getting the facts from somewhere is not realistic.
First, scientists do not agree with the order of creative days in Genesis. Scientists say the source of light, the sun, was before the earth.
They believe that Satan is the ruler of the current world order,  that human society is influenced and misled by Satan and his demons, and that they are a cause of human suffering. They also believe that human governments are controlled by Satan,  but that he does not directly control each human ruler. There is no Hell of fiery torment; Hades and Sheol are understood to refer to the condition of death, termed the common grave.
They interpret Revelation —5 to mean that the number of Christians going to heaven is limited to exactly ,, who will rule with Jesus as kings and priests over earth. This development will mark the beginning of the " great tribulation ". After Armageddon, God will extend his heavenly kingdom to include earth, which will be transformed into a paradise similar to the Garden of Eden. This judgment will be based on their actions after resurrection rather than past deeds. At the end of the thousand years, Christ will hand all authority back to God.
Then a final test will take place when Satan is released to mislead perfect mankind. Those who fail will be destroyed, along with Satan and his demons. The end result will be a fully tested, glorified human race on earth. They believe that Jesus rules invisibly, from heaven, perceived only as a series of "signs".